When Scheme Variations Are Erased : Mutual Fund Critic

SEBI’s resolution to create clearly outlined scheme classes (and to restrict fund homes to at least one scheme per class) was an enormous step in the direction of empowering buyers to make higher scheme decisions.  It’s been a yr since that got here into impact and for probably the most half, it’s been a hit.  Sadly, some funds homes have discovered (or are discovering) methods to wipe out the variations between schemes throughout completely different classes.  Whereas there’s a want for SEBI to step in, buyers additionally should be vigilant, else we may find yourself holding a scheme that’s fairly completely different from what we anticipated it to be. 

On this put up, I wish to share a couple of examples of the number of methods during which fund homes have tried to blur the variations between schemes in numerous classes.  I’ve offered these within the type of a brief quiz.  There’s a hyperlink to the solutions on the finish of the put up.

Q1: Misleading Descriptions

Given under are the descriptions of two open-end fairness funds managed by a sure fund home.  These descriptions have been taken from the fund home web site.  One of many schemes is classed as a ‘Mid Cap’ fund.  Primarily based on these descriptions, are you able to determine which one in all these is the true ‘Mid Cap’ fund?

Fund A:

An open ended fairness scheme predominately investing in mid cap shares

Fund B:

…is primarily a Mid-cap fund which provides buyers the chance to take part within the development story of right this moment’s comparatively medium sized however rising firms which have the potential to be well-established tomorrow.

Q2: Misleading Promoting

Given under are masked banner advertisements for 2 fairness schemes managed by a single fund home.  One among these schemes is classed as a ‘Targeted’ fund, whereas the opposite is classed as a ‘Multi Cap’ fund.  In case you had been capable of learn the detailed descriptions (that are in smaller print), you may need been capable of know which advert is for which scheme.  However since these are web site advertisements, which many may have seen (or will see) on cell gadgets, the headlines change into all of the extra necessary.  Primarily based on the headlines, are you able to determine which of those is the precise ‘Targeted’ fund?

Fund C:

Fund D:

Q3: Misleading Allocations

Going by SEBI’s definition, within the so-called ‘Balanced Benefit’ funds, the fairness/ debt allocation is required to be managed “dynamically”.  Whereas some might take into account that time period to be all-encompassing, from what I’ve gathered, the aim of getting this class is to group these funds the place the fairness/ debt combine shall be determined by means of a strategy of tactical asset allocation.  Because it occurs, no less than one fund home both has an awfully restrictive interpretation of what ‘dynamic’ means or has chosen to not make tactical calls.  The fairness allocation of its ‘Balanced Benefit’ fund has remained in a remarkably slim band and has had little resemblance to that of another ‘Balanced Benefit’ fund.  Nevertheless it has had greater than a passing resemblance to the fairness allocation of the ‘Aggressive Hybrid’ fund managed by the identical fund home.  Given under is the unhedged fairness allocation for the final 12 months for the 2 schemes.  Primarily based on this info, are you able to determine which of those is the ‘Aggressive Hybrid’ fund and which is the ‘Balanced Benefit’ fund?

This autumn: Misleading Danger Profile

‘Credit score Danger’ Funds are required to have no less than 65% of their portfolio in securities which are rated AA or decrease.  It’s typically anticipated that these funds will carry a better credit score danger than another class of debt funds.  Given under is the most recent ranking profile, yield, and maturity of the portfolios of three debt funds, managed by a single fund home.  Primarily based on this info, are you able to determine which of those is the ‘Credit score Danger’ fund?